10/30/2023 0 Comments Download judge anderson dredd![]() ![]() See : we are conscious that the Court is comprised of two non-Psi Judges and a Psi-Judge, Judge Howard. We are lucky to have access to a complete version of the report, which includes Howard J’s dissent (despite the order of the majority that it be suppressed). Much of the background to the existing legal system and the role of the judges in Mega-city One can be found in Giddens in the trial below, particularly at the footnotes () and throughout that text. A clear example is the styling of the written record (report) of the original judgement, which is significantly numbered “1” … there are no previous reports, other than the purely bureaucratic forms which record life on the streets for the Judges. The appeal judges throughout adopt the language of the common law judicial system, which is appropriate since in the hypothetical world of the hearing, Mega-city’s juridical culture has no language of its own to express ideas and processes which were common before the Vogan War, but have fallen into Post-Apocalyptic desuetude. However, for the adoption of the language of the courts and common law systems, a precedent has been set by Anderson v Dredd ). The judicial systems of the Mega-cities do not ordinarily engage in such frolics, having abandoned much of the known system of juridicism in the aftermath of the Vogan War, and seizure of power by the Justice Department of Mega-city One and Chief Judge Fargo (see below note 17). The judgements in this appeal are a hypothetical upon a hypothetical They are based on Thomas Giddens’s article, (2017) Anderson v Dredd Megacity LR 1, which itself was hypothetical judgement of three claims brought by the Psi Judge, Anderson J, against Judge Dredd.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |